Psycho Dave (
Wed, 25 Sep 1996 19:20:51 -0400

Publius wrote:
> Summary:
> Keywords:
> Those of us who have been probing the workings of the
> Atheist/Darwinist mentalities have come up against a puz-
> zling quirk in their thinking process:

But since you never actually have conversations with
atheists, what you have to say about how we think is
strictly your uneducated opinion, based on you talking
to yourself.

> If they really believe what they preach, then they should
> readily admit that as the Evolutionary Process continues, it
> is just a matter of time till Man is succeeded by a Being as
> superior to Man as Man is to the Ape.

Okay. I admit it. It is only a matter of time (or rather,
a matter of time and circumstance -- because evolution
tends to work when there are environmental changes) before
man is replaced by a more advanced species. Big deal.
we'll all be dead by the time it happens, so who cares.
Are you asserting that we deny the inevitable?

> Instead, some say that
> Evolution "was" but no longer "is" - its possibilities evidently
> exhausted.

I challenge you to provide one single example -- a simple
quote from an evolutionary scientist, who said that
"evolution was but no longer is". I dare you. I double
dare you. You lie like a Clinton!

> The smart ones keep quiet because they know that
> if they are true to their Belief they will be admitting that
> Evolution is an open-ended process - in infinite Time and
> Space - and in one way or another, inexorably leads to "The
> Ultimate Configuration of Life" which I have called "God" (for
> want of a better title).

UH -- wrong. All that can be inferred is that all life
will adapt to changes in the environment. There is no
vector of evolution -- no progression towards an
ultimate goal. The only goal of evolution is
reproduction and survival.

> To say that there is a Vector or an
> Order to Evolution (ask Gould) is an Atheist/Darwinist No-No.
> PUBLIUS at <>

Yeah, but that's sort of like saying "to say that
matter can travel faster than the speed of light is a
physicist no-no." Matter cannot go faster than light,
because even approaching light speed, the weight
of an object approaches infinity, and would require
infinite speed + 1 to go faster. LIkewise, evolution
has no vector, because it's only purpose it adapting
to best work in an environment.

|________ ___ __ ___ | Email: |
| /___/ /__ \ / / /__/ / / | |
| / ___/ \/ /__ / / /__/ | Visit Psycho Dave's Dark |
| /_____________/___D__A__V__E__ | And Scary Place |
| |