Ban Rj? YES

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Jan Wilson: "Banning RJ & related topics"
• Previous message: Nick Corduan: "Re: List Moderated???"

>If you would really like to remain on this list, why don't you abstain
>from insulting people, so many people whom we know not to be as you paint
>them. There are some good discussions going on, even including the
>misfortunes of native peoples. Do reconsider your tactics. Ruby Rohrlich

The first time this discussion came along and actually ended with the ban
of Robert Johnson, I was in favor of letting him stay, because of
censorship and the like. Having him/you off the list I didn't miss
anything.

Noew you are back and worse than before. Your U of Colorado letter which
for me showed all the pathological paranoia that you happily share with us
was one over the top. Maybe I just can take more than others or care
less...
BUT ist doesn't belong to this list. A good bit of your other conntribution
do belong to the list and gave me good information.

When Ruby Rohrlich says to consider your tactics I go along with that. You
are of no help to those you claim to be an advocat for with your odd (to
say the least) behaviour.

DO us and yourself a favour get of the list, get a life and sort things out
for yourself. The good stuff that you posted, you can post it to me
directly if you feel it is important.

Two more things than I stop bothering the rest of the list with this:

1. Stop using 3rd Reich comparisons like Himmler e.g.

2. I am NOT a anthropologist


I had to try hard to stay polite....

NIls

• Next message: Jan Wilson: "Banning RJ & related topics"
• Previous message: Nick Corduan: "Re: List Moderated???"