Re: A typical scientist? (Re: Evidence . . . .

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Chuck Dedman: "Re: This cultural vandalism (Re: Evidence for "Big Bang Theory")"
• Previous message: Michael J. Bertrand: "Re: If god exists, what created god?"
• Maybe in reply to: Gil Hardwick: "A typical scientist? (Re: Evidence . . . ."
• Next in thread: Eric Shook: "Re: A typical scientist? (Re: Evidence . . . ."

In article <763@landmark.iinet.net.au>,
Gil Hardwick <gil@landmark.iinet.net.au> wrote:
>That is, the Internet character "John McCarthy" is undoubtedly the
>Hoover Institute itself, seeking deliberately and systematically to
>diminish its political enemies.

Sorry Gil, I don't believe it. It's nothing that simplistic.

Todd Michel McComb
mccomb@best.com http://www.best.com/~mccomb/home.html

Support the Arts & Humanities news hierarchy! Web or email for details.

• Next message: Chuck Dedman: "Re: This cultural vandalism (Re: Evidence for "Big Bang Theory")"
• Previous message: Michael J. Bertrand: "Re: If god exists, what created god?"
• Maybe in reply to: Gil Hardwick: "A typical scientist? (Re: Evidence . . . ."
• Next in thread: Eric Shook: "Re: A typical scientist? (Re: Evidence . . . ."