Re: Gender differences

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Marie Elaine Danforth: "Job announcement"
• Previous message: Dave Stubblefield: "The Enduring Maya!!! a trip to the past."
• Maybe in reply to: ann.nunn@sstar.com: "Gender differences"
• Next in thread: Eric Shook: "Re: Gender differences"

In article <762@landmark.iinet.net.au>, gil@landmark.iinet.net.au (Gil Hardwick) writes:
|>
|> In article <3ojlk6$aek@triton.unm.edu>, Bryant (mycol1@unm.edu) writes:
|> >Are humans considered sexually dimorphic in size. My subjective
|> >impression is that men are taller (not just more robust) than women. Is
|> >that generally accepted by anthropologists?
|>
|> No they are not, and no it is not. People come in all shapes and
|> sizes. For every tall woman an anthropologist will find you a short
|> man, and vice versa.

Gil must have flunked his introductory statistics class in which
averages were discussed. :-)

-- 


Warren S. Sarle       SAS Institute Inc.   The opinions expressed here

saswss@unx.sas.com    SAS Campus Drive     are mine and not necessarily

(919) 677-8000        Cary, NC 27513, USA  those of SAS Institute.

• Next message: Marie Elaine Danforth: "Job announcement"
• Previous message: Dave Stubblefield: "The Enduring Maya!!! a trip to the past."
• Maybe in reply to: ann.nunn@sstar.com: "Gender differences"
• Next in thread: Eric Shook: "Re: Gender differences"