Re: Replacing babies (was Re: PROPOSAL: Alt.terriorism.american)
Gil Hardwick (gil@landmark.iinet.net.au)
Sat, 06 May 1995 09:22:56 GMT
In article <17394D41.MBAUSER@kentvm.kent.edu>, Michael Bauser (MBAUSER@kentvm.kent.edu) writes:
>Note: I'm adding sci.anthropology to the "Newsgroups" header, because
>all of a sudden, we're talking about sociobiology. Sociobiology AND
>politics. Wonderful combination, isn't it?
Now just what would make you think this "sociobiology" crud is of any
more interest to anthropology than extremist politics, Michael? Most
especially in reply to some outright crackpot loony you take it upon
yourself to engage.
Since you find reason to subscribe to such marginal newsgroups, why
don't you just keep this sort of nonsense over there?
Here we already have more than enough data on all these weirdos, and
would much prefer to be getting on with far important issues relating
to such topics as the collapse of farming systems, the epidemiology of
exotic diseases, particular health problems of women and children, and
the failure of governments to address these issues.
Were we ever allowed to just get on with it . . .
Don't you feel that these bandwidths might nevertheless be allowed to
remain free for such traffic, perhaps?
There's a good boy now.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
He who refuses to qualify data is doomed to rant.
+61 97 53 3270
|