Re: If god exists, what created god?
Rodney Wines (R_WINES@TRZCL1)
1 May 1995 10:07:48 GMT
In <email@example.com> firstname.lastname@example.org writes:
> >> God is birthless and deathless, eternal, omnipresent.
> >Interesting theory, but where're your facts to support it?
> But he doesn't have to have facts to support it. All he has to do is
> SAY it for the idea to be invoked.
He doesn't HAVE to get out of bed in the morning. So what?
If he wants me to take him seriously, he has to do more than "SAY it". The
world is full of ideas, and most of them are crackpot. I'd rather think
about the ones which are in some way testable. I don't _NEED_ a god to
explain the origin of the universe, and I'll happily go to my grave with
the issue unexplained if that's the way it turns out.
> Note that the claim is not that God exists, only that God IS ...
I personally don't see a distinction.
> Might as well just stop savaging each other about it . . .
Why? This is fun.
| Internet: email@example.com | "I always wanted roots, |
| X.400: c=CH a=arCom p=Alcatel | but if I can't have roots |
| s=Wines g=Rodney | I'll have wings." |