Re: Evidence for "Big Bang Theory"
Jason W. Nyberg (firstname.lastname@example.org)
27 Apr 1995 19:06:11 GMT
email@example.com (Robert Roosen) writes:
/David Thomas (firstname.lastname@example.org) wrote:
/: In article <Pine.SCO.3.91.950416110029.27051Demail@example.com>,
/: Robert Roosen <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
/: > The big bang cosmologists seem to have a much lower opinion of
/: >God's capabilities :-)
/: Or a higher opinion of nature's.
/OK, I'll bite. What's the difference between nature and God?
"Nature" is a label we use to describe the material world as a whole.
The concept has been anthropomorphicized, but when a scientist uses the
term, they're usually referring to something non-sentient.
A "god" or the "God" refers to a superhuman being worshipped as having
supernatural powers or abilities (according to my pocket dictionary.)
This definition implies sentience.
Jason Nyberg (email@example.com) My thoughts, my opinions.
Cabletron Systems, Inc. Merrimack NH
On the surface, in the air, under water, I'll be there!