Re: IQ AND RACE? HUH?
Ian T Brown (email@example.com)
5 Feb 1995 01:48:48 -0800
In article <D3GIyF.Gnu@eskimo.com>, Stephen Lajoie <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>In article <email@example.com>,
>Lord Zilch)@clark.net ( <thedavid> wrote:
>It would seem that this "pale-Gentile bunch" are a bit more objective
>than others, seeking only a level playingfield, while others have a
>vested interest in special programs.
Given the history of this "pale-Gentile bunch," your generalization isn't
>>If you're out to prove you're (relatively?) "not too bright" please
>>consider you've done so quite conclusively. Now shut the hell up!
>Again, you overlook that difference between an individual and a population.
You do as well, with your statement that those in the "pale-Gentile
bunch" are objective because they don't have any vested interests, but
those that aren't can't be becuase they do.
"What a waste it is to lose one's mind, or not to have a mind is being
very wasteful." -- Dan Quayle
"Book 'em, Dannoe." -- Jack Lord