Re: AAT: I just rediscovered my news filter

H. M. Hubey (
15 Oct 1995 15:48:46 -0400 (Phil Nicholls) writes:

>The primary objection to the aquatic ape theory is that there is no
>evidence to support it. If that is not a valid objection, if that
>does not "ring true" then I rather doubt that anything will.

Would you (and everyone else so inclined) please list
in order of increasing convincibility what kinds of evidence
one expects to "support" AAT.

Please, do it.

This space left purposefully blank.


Regards, Mark