Re: Sociobiology (was Re: Patriarchy: Re: What Matriarchy?)

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: John Wilkins: "Re: Adaptationism's Lessons (was Re: Evolution, "adaptation")"
• Previous message: Bryant: "Re: Patriarchy: Re: What Matriarchy?"
• Maybe in reply to: Bryant: "Sociobiology (was Re: Patriarchy: Re: What Matriarchy?)"

In article <50mumg$3454@argo.unm.edu>, mycol1@unm.edu (Bryant) wrote:

| In article <50ko6l$6nd@news.sdd.hp.com>,
| Gerold Firl <geroldf@sdd.hp.com> wrote:
| >
| >Phillip Kitchener, a bloody ignorant philosophy prof at ucsd (it's
| >embarrassing) attempted to write a scholarly critique of sociobiology
| >(I forget the name; I can look it up if you're interested. It's
| >copiously referenced to give the appearance of scholarly rigor, but
| >very poorly reasoned).
|
| _Vaulting Ambition_, I believe.
|
And it should be Kitcher.

-- 

John Wilkins, Head of Communication Services, Walter and Eliza

Hall Institute of Medical Research

<http://www.wehi.edu.au/~wilkins/www.html><mailto:wilkins@wehi.edu.au>

It is the glory of science that it finds the patterns 

in spite of the noise - Daniel Dennett

• Next message: John Wilkins: "Re: Adaptationism's Lessons (was Re: Evolution, "adaptation")"
• Previous message: Bryant: "Re: Patriarchy: Re: What Matriarchy?"
• Maybe in reply to: Bryant: "Sociobiology (was Re: Patriarchy: Re: What Matriarchy?)"