Re: Big Bang: How widely accepted?

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: seda@ycvax.york.cuny.edu: "test"
• Previous message: Robert Roosen: "Re: Big Bang: How widely accepted?"

Roger M. Wilcox (tracer@best.com) wrote:
: In article <AC6BED2E96687E9D@cara.demon.co.uk> peter@cara.demon.co.uk (Peter Ceresole) writes:
: >
: >The anomalies and complications are *so* complicated that news editors only
: >run them after they have heard some kind of explanation like Inflation (is
: >inflation still necessary these days?).

: Only if the Federal Reserve keeps up its policy of "loaning" money into
: existence through the banks. :-)

Ah yes, the social analogies of science to religion. Are you predicting
the Big Crash?

• Next message: seda@ycvax.york.cuny.edu: "test"
• Previous message: Robert Roosen: "Re: Big Bang: How widely accepted?"