Re: Big Bang: How widely accepted?
Robert Roosen (roosen@crash.cts.com)
Tue, 12 Sep 1995 02:13:35 GMT
Someone wrote
: : You might try to read outside astronomy a little. Hannes Alfvens work in
: : Plasma Physics has done some real damage to Big Bang. The BB theory is NOT
: : almost universally accepted. There are some steady staters left and a whole
: : new crop of plasma cosmology theorists. Try Lerners "The Big Bang Never
: : Happened " as a start. He gives an excellent descripton of teh alternates
: : and the problems in publishing challenges to big bang.
Check the URLs on the debunkers. The majority of them are being paid by
branches of the Military/Industrial Complex. They are blind to truth
because of this. In the US this phenomenon is called "conflict of interest".
In 1972 I testified against letting the Atomic Energy Commission
set all the rules for handling radioactive materials in the State of New
Mexico. Of 150 people in the room, only two of us had paid our own way
to come. The rest worked for the AEC and its contractors. We got the
same sort of flak then. The employees of the system really did believe
they were thinking for themselves, when in fact they had "Stockholm
Syndrome" written all over them.
btw, the key is the lack of humor they show while "defending"
something they do not understand.
|