These guard dogs (Re: Evidence for "Big Bang Theory")
Gil Hardwick (gil@landmark.iinet.net.au)
Wed, 03 May 1995 05:11:10 GMT
In article <3o52le$b58@gap.cco.caltech.edu>, Carl J Lydick (carl@SOL1.GPS.CALTECH.EDU) writes:
>
>Why, Gil, I was merely applying your own moronic claims to you, yourself. Too
>stupid to see that were you?
Oh they're not mere claims, old fruits, but reliable and independently
verified observations on your presence here.
Please let me ask of you, do you have anything to contribute to this
thread, or are you merely being employed by somebody lurking around
the place to sit there day by day savaging us poor heretics?
I don't really mind either way, in the ultimacy of things, so long as
we have you in our sights. I can soon put an off-line trace on you if
you decide to go too far over the top; maybe it will take 18 months or
so to get the information back and confirmed, but no worries.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
He who refuses to qualify data is doomed to rant.
+61 97 53 3270
|