Re: These guard dogs (Re: Evidence for "Big Bang Theory")

Carl J Lydick (carl@SOL1.GPS.CALTECH.EDU)
4 May 1995 12:45:00 GMT

In article <616@landmark.iinet.net.au>, gil@landmark.iinet.net.au (Gil Hardwick) writes:
=
=In article <3o52le$b58@gap.cco.caltech.edu>, Carl J Lydick (carl@SOL1.GPS.CALTECH.EDU) writes:
=>
=>Why, Gil, I was merely applying your own moronic claims to you, yourself. Too
=>stupid to see that were you?
=
=Oh they're not mere claims, old fruits, but reliable and independently
=verified observations on your presence here.

Why, you ARE too stupid to understand, Gil. I was referring to your claim that
everything's determined by cultural biases. Now, perhaps you can explain why
it's valid for you to dismiss the Big Bang theory as mere cultural bias, and
it's not valid for me to dismiss your ravings using the same argument? Are you
really that incompetent?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Carl J Lydick | INTERnet: CARL@SOL1.GPS.CALTECH.EDU | NSI/HEPnet: SOL1::CARL

Disclaimer: Hey, I understand VAXen and VMS. That's what I get paid for. My
understanding of astronomy is purely at the amateur level (or below). So
unless what I'm saying is directly related to VAX/VMS, don't hold me or my
organization responsible for it. If it IS related to VAX/VMS, you can try to
hold me responsible for it, but my organization had nothing to do with it.