Re: The Shifting AAT

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Andrew Spring: "Re: Ancestors of armadillos"
• Previous message: jamesb@hgu.mrc.ac.uk: "Re: The Shifting AAT"
• Maybe in reply to: J. Moore: "The Shifting AAT"
• Next in thread: David L Burkhead : "Re: The Shifting AAT"

r3dlb1@dax.cc.uakron.edu (David L Burkhead ) wrote:

> As for being "readily falsifiable," when I consider the
>contortions some folk have shown themselves willing to go through here
>to preserve the claims and assumptions that go into their "evidence" I
>don't think the finding of an isolated fossil or two, which _might_
>happen, far from large bodies of water (at the time) will deter the
>aquatic proponents.
>

Well I would suggest to you that the best way to falsify the AAT would be to find evidence of a
purely terrestrial weeping animal. But this suggestion has been misunderstood and I have met with
much sarcasm.....

James Borrett.

• Next message: Andrew Spring: "Re: Ancestors of armadillos"
• Previous message: jamesb@hgu.mrc.ac.uk: "Re: The Shifting AAT"
• Maybe in reply to: J. Moore: "The Shifting AAT"
• Next in thread: David L Burkhead : "Re: The Shifting AAT"