Re: The Shifting AAT

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: jamesb@hgu.mrc.ac.uk: "Re: The Shifting AAT"
• Previous message: Bill Burnett: "Adaptive landscapes and drift Was Re: Ears under pressure."
• Maybe in reply to: J. Moore: "The Shifting AAT"
• Next in thread: jamesb@hgu.mrc.ac.uk: "Re: The Shifting AAT"

clarke@acme.ucf.edu (Thomas Clarke) wrote:

>
>How many times am I going to have to point out that all you have
>to do is find a non-aquatic fossil squence to disprove the AAT/H/S.
>

>

Quite.

The other thing that annoys me besides the claim that AAT is unfalsifiable (sounds like a made-up
excuse for mot having falsified it to me) is that there is no evidence in its favour. Just because
some evidence is anecdotal or can be interpreted in other ways or is based on modern human
physiology rather than fossils doesn't mean thhat this isn't supportive evidence .

James Borrett.

• Next message: jamesb@hgu.mrc.ac.uk: "Re: The Shifting AAT"
• Previous message: Bill Burnett: "Adaptive landscapes and drift Was Re: Ears under pressure."
• Maybe in reply to: J. Moore: "The Shifting AAT"
• Next in thread: jamesb@hgu.mrc.ac.uk: "Re: The Shifting AAT"