Re: The Shifting AAT

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: J. Moore: "Re: Alex's point... was R"
• Previous message: chris brochu: "Re: Ancestors of armadillos"
• Maybe in reply to: J. Moore: "The Shifting AAT"
• Next in thread: jamesb@hgu.mrc.ac.uk: "Re: The Shifting AAT"

In article <465mq7$3lk@news.cc.ucf.edu> Thomas Clarke,
clarke@acme.ucf.edu writes:
>Ah, but does the tatto explain anything about Disraeli's behavior
>as PM under Victoria? If it did the analogy to the AAT would be better.
>As it stands, it's not a very good analogy.
>

As it stands, it wasn't meant as an analogy for the AAS in the first
place. I was referring specifically to the assertion that hominid tears
could have been more hypersaline in the past - an assertion you cannot
prove wrong. The post didn't go where I wanted it to go, and I apologize
for any confusion.

• Next message: J. Moore: "Re: Alex's point... was R"
• Previous message: chris brochu: "Re: Ancestors of armadillos"
• Maybe in reply to: J. Moore: "The Shifting AAT"
• Next in thread: jamesb@hgu.mrc.ac.uk: "Re: The Shifting AAT"