Re: AAT Theory

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Phil Nicholls: "Re: Refs, please... was... Re: AAT Theory"
• Previous message: David L Burkhead : "Re: AAT Theory"

In article <hubey.813213867@pegasus.montclair.edu> hubey@pegasus.montclair.edu
(H. M. Hubey) writes:
> Phil Hunt <philip@storcomp.demon.co.uk> writes:

> >As to why the fur was lost, I can think of 2 possibilities offhand:
> >to keep cool while running during the day, or sex selection.

> Well, the sex selection seems to be a standard dumping ground like
> money to explain things for which we can't find any other explanation.

> I don't see any way to prove or disprove sex selection changes for
> anything in general.

Which would turn you on more?
A woman with nice smooth naked skin,
Or a woman with nice sleek fur?
[If you are female, please reverse sexes]
Be honest.

I know it is difficult to seperate societal effects, but
some evidenct can be gained from "what turns you on" I would
think.

Tom Clarke

• Next message: Phil Nicholls: "Re: Refs, please... was... Re: AAT Theory"
• Previous message: David L Burkhead : "Re: AAT Theory"