Re: significant topics

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Larry Cebula College of Bill and Mary: "Re: ANTHRO-L Digest - 4 Sep 1995 to 5 Sep 1995"
• Previous message: Kari Forbes-Boyte: "Re: The Nature of Warfare"
• Maybe in reply to: Michael Thomas Carson: "significant topics"

Bravo to this Anthropologist!
I am also relatively new to this list, amd was fast becoming fed up with
the wacky dialogs that appear to occupy most of the postings. I would
propose we refrain from personal comments about others, no matter how
pertinent they appear to the sender. This list is described in the charter
as a forum for issues of anthropological relevance, not interpersonel
conflict, no matter how just ones complaint is!
Know I don't want to get on a rant here, but I chalange the readers of this
list to begin some discussions of theoretical and practical relevance from
now on. I will begin the new tide of intellectual awareness and flow of
ideas with my next posting.
veni, vidi, vici

John A. Giacobbe

• Next message: Larry Cebula College of Bill and Mary: "Re: ANTHRO-L Digest - 4 Sep 1995 to 5 Sep 1995"
• Previous message: Kari Forbes-Boyte: "Re: The Nature of Warfare"
• Maybe in reply to: Michael Thomas Carson: "significant topics"