\ (
Tue, 24 Sep 1996 11:01:22 -0400

Publius wrote:
> Summary:
> Keywords:
> Those of us who have been probing the workings of the
> Atheist/Darwinist mentalities have come up against a puz-
> zling quirk in their thinking process:

Why would you equate "Darwinist" with "Atheist"? I assume you are ignorant
of Darwins work - the only other possibility would be intentional dishonesty.

> If they really believe what they preach, then they should
> readily admit that as the Evolutionary Process continues, it
> is just a matter of time till Man is succeeded by a Being as
> superior to Man as Man is to the Ape.

Yes, man will continue to evolve. But why would you assume he would be
"superior" to today's man?

> Instead, some say that
> Evolution "was" but no longer "is" - its possibilities evidently
> exhausted.

OH? Can you give me an example of ANY responsible scientist making such a
ludicrous claim?

> The smart ones keep quiet because they know that
> if they are true to their Belief they will be admitting that
> Evolution is an open-ended process - in infinite Time and
> Space - and in one way or another, inexorably leads to "The
> Ultimate Configuration of Life" which I have called "God" (for
> want of a better title).

For someone who (I assume) claims to be a Christian, I'm suprised to hear
this kind of blasphemy. Man is a biological being. How could he conceivably
evolve into being a deity?!

> To say that there is a Vector or an
> Order to Evolution (ask Gould) is an Atheist/Darwinist No-No.
> PUBLIUS at <>

This is completely opposite of the facts. Please read some of Darwin's work
before attempting to trash him. This type of post really makes you look

- "Hank"