Re: Patriarchy: Re: What Matriarchy?
Bryant (mycol1@unm.edu)
8 Sep 1996 11:23:35 -0600
In article <50u9l2$fdk@sjx-ixn6.ix.netcom.com>,
Mary Beth Williams <mbwillia@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>In article <50q1c1$72s@news.sdd.hp.com>, Gerold Firl said:
>>I noticed that you wrote that bryant had a "theory" that rape was "ok"
>>because it's a "natural adaptation". Now, if you read what he wrote
>>above (the 3 paragraphs above yours) where he specifically states that
>>the naturalistic fallacy *is* a fallacy, and that rape is *not* ok, it
>>seems clear that only an english major (or a postmodernist
>>deconstructionalist postprocessualist ad nauseum) could reach such a
>>conclusion.
>
>Hey, wait a minute! As a thoroughly entrenched
>PM/PP/deconstructionist/Marxist/ad nauseum, I balk at the allegation
>that we would ever support such deterministic crap [...]
:) So we can trust y'all to stop pulling the naturalistic fallacy
nonsense whenever we discuss rape or infanticide or sexism? Fantastic!
>MB Williams
Bryant
|