Re: BARBARIAN ATTITUDE

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Etherman: "Re: Missing Mass (was Re: Big Bang: How widely accepted?)"
• Previous message: Marty G. Price: "Re: Life Duty Death"
• Maybe in reply to: dannie hawkins: "BARBARIAN ATTITUDE"
• Next in thread: Mark Metson: "Re: BARBARIAN ATTITUDE"

In article <4389vh$hnt@remus.reed.edu>, mmazurek@reed.edu (Weazel) wrote:

> In article <marnix-1309951435200001@fae2xx.biostat.washington.edu>,
> Marnix L. Bosch <marnix@u.washington.edu> wrote:
> >This thread does NOT belong here. Can't we get rid of it?
> I agree that the thread is inapproriate ot some of the newsgroups posted
> to. You, however, did not say where you are reading it, so you have no
> way of telling the rest of us what to trim out of our followups.
> Personally, while I find Mr. Hawkins distasteful at best, this particular
> thread seems to have provoked some interesting discussion, so I'm
> continuing to follow it.

I apologize for not setting my follow-ups correctly. My complaint was
directed at finding this in bionet.general. There are better places for
these discussions.

Marnix

-- 

Marnix L. Bosch

marnix@u.washington.edu

• Next message: Etherman: "Re: Missing Mass (was Re: Big Bang: How widely accepted?)"
• Previous message: Marty G. Price: "Re: Life Duty Death"
• Maybe in reply to: dannie hawkins: "BARBARIAN ATTITUDE"
• Next in thread: Mark Metson: "Re: BARBARIAN ATTITUDE"