Re: What Are the Race Deniers Denying?

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: fred: "sauropods?"
• Previous message: Bob Whitaker: "Re: What Are the Race Deniers Denying?"

Bob Whitaker <bwhit@conterra.com> wrote:

[...]

> Once again, I know a Poltiically Correct person would never even
>imagine asking why "Scientific Anthropology" is ALWAYS perfectly
>Politically Correct. I gave the example of Boas emovement from a kook
>to a saint in the 1930-1945 period.

You asserted this, but you have not given a shred of evidence to
demonstrate that it is true. Boas was widely respected in scientific
and anthropological circles long before he died. This is evident
in his publications and lectures before respected bodies such as
the American Academy of Science in the late 19th and early 20th
century. Get your facts straight, Bob.

> I am bringing this up for thought by people who can think, not PC
>clones.
> Anthropology is a whore.

Is this your assessment of Hans G€nther's work?

"If I can't dance.....I don't want to be part of your revolution."
Emma Goldman

• Next message: fred: "sauropods?"
• Previous message: Bob Whitaker: "Re: What Are the Race Deniers Denying?"