Re: What Are the Race Deniers Denying?
Bob Whitaker (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Wed, 27 Nov 1996 11:31:57 -0500
Laura Finsten wrote:
> Bob Whitaker <email@example.com> wrote:
> > Once again, I know a Poltiically Correct person would never even
> >imagine asking why "Scientific Anthropology" is ALWAYS perfectly
> >Politically Correct. I gave the example of Boas emovement from a kook
> >to a saint in the 1930-1945 period.
> You asserted this, but you have not given a shred of evidence to
> demonstrate that it is true. Boas was widely respected in scientific
> and anthropological circles long before he died. This is evident
> in his publications and lectures before respected bodies such as
> the American Academy of Science in the late 19th and early 20th
> century. Get your facts straight, Bob.
> > I am bringing this up for thought by people who can think, not PC
> > Anthropology is a whore.
> Is this your assessment of Hans Gnther's work?
> "If I can't dance.....I don't want to be part of your revolution."
> Emma Goldman
If I understand correctly, Gunther was writing when his views were
Politically Correct. I think, for example ,that the antrolpologist sof
Nazi Germany and Stalin's Lysonckoists were percect examples of the
whore you call Scientific Anthropolgy.
You simply cannot be scientific and at the same time unfailingly come
down on the side of the establishment of your time.