Re: What Are the Race Deniers Denying?
Bob Whitaker (email@example.com)
Tue, 26 Nov 1996 00:27:58 -0500
Toby Cockcroft wrote:
> In article <32932FC7.14AB@conterra.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
> <in reference to Laura>
> > PC has thousands of people like yo to come up with plusible attacks
> >on all opposition. All tyrannies do. It is your absolutely perfect
> >record of PC consistency that discredits you.
> Tautologies like these are the basis of your arguments Bob. You have
> provided no evidence of lying or deception on the part of any of your
> critics in alt.anthropology. Your argument that: PC = lies , Laura =
> PC, therfore Laura = Liar is a false logic. Dogs = Pets, Dogs = Bark,
> therefore Pets = Bark logically formulated but wrong none the less. If
> you are going to try to argue and make a point Bob then you ought to use
> little less of the Orwellian doublespeak that you so fondly accuse your
> detractors of using. You say nothing and have never proved your point and
> consistently fail to see how we have answered the original question time
> and time again.
Once again, I know a Poltiically Correct person would never even
imagine asking why "Scientific Anthropology" is ALWAYS perfectly
Politically Correct. I gave the example of Boas emovement from a kook
to a saint in the 1930-1945 period.
I am bringing this up for thought by people who can think, not PC
Anthropology is a whore.