Re: What Are the Race Deniers Denying?
jrs (pka00085@alpha.wvup.wvnet.edu)
Fri, 22 Nov 1996 16:17:10 -0500
Laura Finsten <finsten@mcmaster.ca> wrote:
>Bob Whitaker <bwhit@conterra.com> wrote:
>[...]
>> In your duets with others accusing the National Alliance of being
>>Nazi, you never dsitance yourself from them, so one must assume you
>>agree that it is a Nazi organization. I know the only reason a
>>left-wing social democrat is not a communist is because he does not
>>favor totalitariansim, and you claimed you knew the same thing about
>>racists versus Nazis, but I still have seen no sign of it whatsoever.
>I'm not quite sure I follow you here, Bob. Are you saying that the
>only thing of note about the National Alliance is its racism? Are
>you saying that it does not otherwise have a totalitarian agenda?
>I know a lot of people who call organisations like the National
>Alliance and the Aryan Nations "Nazi" organisations. Others use
>the term "neo-Nazi". I've heard people say that there is no need
>to call them "neo-" since the only difference is that Hitler ain't
>head of the group any more. I frankly don't think the name matters.
>It is the content. So are you saying that the National Alliance
>is just like any other political party except for its racist platform?
>>> So you are calling me a liar.
>> That assumes that a totally Politically Correct clone like you
>>understands that what she says is not the truth. To you, this is The
>>Truth.
>Oh, I see. You're calling me an idiot. You are claiming that I don't
>know enough about problematic archaeological contexts, skeletal
>identification, and radiometric dating to have a sense of when caution
>should be exercised in evaluating partial evidence. So what do you
>know about these things, Bob, that leads you to think you can judge
>this better than me? Did you study that in graduate economics
>seminars, Bob? Or while you were writing your great "theoretical"
>contributions, did you do some human osteology on the side, maybe
>make decisions about which samples to submit for radiocarbon dating
>and then interpret the dates when you got them back from the lab?
>Have you followed the literature on forensic skeletal identification,
>Bob?
Y'know, Laura, I have a funny feeling that Bobby is just a'gonna
refrain from giving any cogent reply to this post. Lessee, I predict
he'll just say something about you and PC. Whaddaya think?
>[...]
>> You PC clones keep insisting that a whole population that has lived and
>>been educated under your brain-dead tyranny has to be psychic to know
>>what you're thinking. What you have to say is said over and over and
>>over and over at public expense.
>> We know you.
>Sure you do, Bob.
>"If I can't dance..... I don't want to be part of your revolution."
> Emma Goldman
|