Re: A typical scientist? (Re: Evidence . . . .

Gil Hardwick (
Mon, 22 May 1995 02:44:58 GMT

In article <3pmd44$>, Carl J Lydick (carl@SOL1.GPS.CALTECH.EDU) writes:
>Yup. Gil, who CLAIMS that he simply doesn't want the topic in
>sci.anthropology, still posts his bullshit to three other newsgroups, pretty
>much guaranteeing that that the thread will continue. So, is Gil a liar, or a
>moron? Or both? It's got to be one of those.

Neither of those, Carl. As you well know, I merely assert my right to
reply to the same audience to which you see fit to post your abuse.

The thread can continue as long as you want. I don't really care that
much whether it goes on into eternity if you want it to.

Put simply, so long as you computer programmers employed to maintain
this here Internet thingy sit there abusing people who want to use
it for their own purposes, I for one will continue replying to you.

You can choose to find something more useful to do with your time, or
maybe as I have suggested often enough seek to limit your own use of
these facilities to your own conference areas (that is, the comp.*
hierarchy) as we very plainly do, or just get off altogether.

I repeat, Carl old fruits, I simply don't care for your continuing
garbage drivel and I shall continue replying to it as I see fit.