Re: A typical scientist? (Re: Evidence . . . .

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Kai Henningsen: "Re: Evidence for "Big Bang Theory""
• Previous message: Karin Axell: "Proof-readers needed $7/hr."
• Maybe in reply to: Gil Hardwick: "A typical scientist? (Re: Evidence . . . ."
• Next in thread: Steinn Sigurdsson: "Re: A typical scientist? (Re: Evidence . . . ."

Panopticon@oubliette.COM wrote on 13.05.95 in <Admin.0ym6@oubliette.COM>:

[...]

> actions. The act of responding with just about _any_ contradictory
> information maintains a place for the general views that we hold to be true
> in a much more specific way. Really, if I had to spend much time typing
> out my thoughts in the usenet because I actually thought that the specific
> sense was well conveyed, then I _would_ be insane. The truth is that I have
> joined a conspiracy unintentionally. I realize the worth of inflating the
> big bang topic line. I am even ready to add on cross-posts as we flicker by
> other unrelated topics. It is an expanding point.

[...]

A really neat self-*plonk*.

Kai

--

Internet: kai@khms.westfalen.de

Bang: major_backbone!khms.westfalen.de!kai

http://www.westfalen.de/~kai/

## CrossPoint v3.02 ##

• Next message: Kai Henningsen: "Re: Evidence for "Big Bang Theory""
• Previous message: Karin Axell: "Proof-readers needed $7/hr."
• Maybe in reply to: Gil Hardwick: "A typical scientist? (Re: Evidence . . . ."
• Next in thread: Steinn Sigurdsson: "Re: A typical scientist? (Re: Evidence . . . ."