Re: These guard dogs (Re: Evidence for "Big Bang Theory")

Gil Hardwick (
Thu, 11 May 1995 05:40:24 GMT

In article <Admin.0x15@oubliette.COM>, Eric Shook (Panopticon@oubliette.COM) writes:
>In article <3oi1pl$> carl@SOL1.GPS.CALTECH.EDU (Carl J Lydick) writes:
>> Why, you ARE too stupid to understand, Gil. I was referring to your claim that
> ^^^^^^
>> What that is, Gil, is that you must apply your own moronic bullshit to
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> yoursrelf. You are, unfortunately, demonstrably too stupid to understand that.
> ^^^^^^
>> confine your bullshit to the anthropology newsgroup, instead of inflicting your
> ^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^
>> ignorance on such groups as sci.astro? Or are you too stupid to learn how to
> ^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^
>> use your newsreader?
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Carl, could you be more explicit? I'm having a hard time understanding
>whatever it is you are trying to say. I know that you mean well, but
>perhaps you could give it another try. Do you think that maybe a _few more_
>of your cleverly inserted adjectives might make it any clearer for me?

Oh please, Eric, you butt in on my class once too often!

Carl is reading his term paper on the use of repeatedly inserted
adjectives in pleonastic tautology to relay EMOTION to the reader.

While I personally think its all just a load of shit, nonetheless he
is a hard working student and I'll give him a C+ in encouragement.