Re: These guard dogs (Re: Evidence for "Big Bang Theory")

Gil Hardwick (
Mon, 08 May 1995 05:23:01 GMT

In article <3oi1pl$>, Carl J Lydick (carl@SOL1.GPS.CALTECH.EDU) writes:
>What that is, Gil, is that you must apply your own moronic bullshit to
>yoursrelf. You are, unfortunately, demonstrably too stupid to understand that.

Do persist, Carl. So nice to see your rant broadcast so widely.

>In that case, Gil, if that's REALLY all you're asserting, then why don't you
>confine your bullshit to the anthropology newsgroup, instead of inflicting your
>ignorance on such groups as sci.astro? Or are you too stupid to learn how to
>use your newsreader?

Oh but I do, Carl. Do come and check that of the list I subscribe only
to sci.anthropology.

Somebody over there on your side of the planet, on the other hand,
insists on having this thread x-posted to a good half-dozen groups at
once, and I could not be bothered arguing with them any longer about
where it all ends up.

As I have pointed out to you before often enough, in the ultimacy of
things it is all just grist to the anthropological mill.

Our job is merely to observe and report on human behaviour, your own

He who refuses to qualify data is doomed to rant.
+61 97 53 3270