Re: Evidence for "Big Bang Theory"

Erik Max Francis (
Sat, 06 May 95 19:26:12 PDT (Gil Hardwick) writes:

> In article <3ntm7g$>, Ken Smith ( writ
> >Not really. The one truely non-renewable resourse would be time. The
> >expression "stop waisting time" would take on a new meaning.
> Does that mean I won't be allowed to loll about under a shady tree
> watching the world go by any longer? Pity . . .
> I suppose your Thought Police are going to provide me with their usual
> "incentives to work" instead, are they?

Take a valium. From this post, anyway, Ken Smith's cosmology is
correct, at least according to current theories.

Erik Max Francis, &tSftDotIotE ...!uuwest!alcyone!max
San Jose, CA ... GIGO, Hg, Omega, Universe, Psi ... ICBM: 37 20 N 121 53 W _
H.3`S,3,P,3$S,#$Q,C`Q,3,P,3$S,#$Q,3`Q,3,P,C$Q,#(Q.#`-"C`- ftmfbs kmmfa mc2 / \
Omnia quia sunt, lumina sunt. ("All things that are, are lights.") -><- \_/
"We all may have come on different ships, but we're in the same boat now."