Re: Evidence for "Big Bang Theory"

Gil Hardwick (
Thu, 04 May 1995 02:47:31 GMT

In article <>, China ( writes:
>> Whooooooooosh! (In case you haven't caught on, you missed it.
>> Apparenly went right over your head).
>> For the intellectually impaired, the implication was that god was a
>> human invention. Do you get it now?

Really? I'd never have guessed . . .

>I don't think anyone missed it. Our friend, once removed, was
>deliberatly misunderstanding -- I think. Its exactly what I would have
>said, and I understood.
>It was a cute answer, but a little too easy. Neither God nor nature are
>that simple.

There is no argument that God or nature are "that simple". All the
grade-school ning-nongs taking this here thread so seriously are the
simpletons, I do submit.

He who refuses to qualify data is doomed to rant.
+61 97 53 3270