Re^4: The Flat Earth? - Conclusion
Marcus C. Gottwald (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Sun, 16 Jul 1995 18:53:00 +0200
('email@example.com' (Madhudvisah dasa Swami) wrote this
on the topic of "Re: Re^2: The Flat Earth? - Conclusion".)
s> ...There are many things beyond our ability to see (for
s> example what's outside the universe). We can never find out by the
s> ascending process of science. The ONLY way we can know is if we can find
s> an authority...
I think that you can understand that I have trouble accepting
this authority. As explained earlier, for the information in a
telephone book, there is an easy explanation where it comes from.
In a case like this, there isn't.
s> >...If I walked up to someone and said: "I have climbed a
s> >mountain, got a vision, I know everything, you have to accept my
s> >knowledge!", do you think, they would do it? No, because their
s> >common sense tells them not to.
s> No. You are correct...
s> ...But the real qualified spiritual master can explain
s> everything very clearly. In the beginning there are so many questions and
s> the disciple must also test his intending spiritual master to see if he is
s> actually qualified, there is no shortage of false, cheating gurus... This
s> has made things a little difficult, but still the way to get knowledge is
s> to find a real guru.
So what I should try, is to find someone who has an answer to
everything that I want to know. That certainly causes trouble, if
a scientific and a non-scientific person try to follow the same
"master". And - what I personally don't like about it, is that
there is no proof at all.
This master would have to be all-knowing. What I am asking myself
here is why there are different views, different things taught by
different, BUT ALL-KNOWING persons. There has to be something,
that is not known. And in a case like that, it is up to me to
believe someone. And in exactly that position, I could be told
basically anything. It is this fact, that I don't like. And I
assume it is this fact, that so many people who are scientists
don't follow the way of gaining knowledge that you are
s> ...But intelligent,
s> thoughtful people also surrender to a bona fide spiritual master to get
s> real knowledge...
Well, I wouldn't.
s> If you find the Absolute Truth you will never have to stop believing in
s> it. You will be completely satisfied with it. You don't have to change...
O.k., just one thing: If you know the absolute truth, why haven't
you told it to your friends and they have told it to someone else
etc.? Where do _you_ (or the "master" you got it from) know it
from, that this world's scientists don't know it?
One more question I am interested in: Have you ever questioned
anything you were told? I do not mean asking "But why?", but
saying "No, that's wrong because...". And if yes, were you able
to speak to your "master" about it?
See ya, Professor
"What is the best way to accelerate a Macintosh?"
*Marcus C. Gottwald* *Professor@assi.s-link.de*
## CrossPoint v3.0 ##