Re: There are racists; but no races.
Bob Whitaker (email@example.com)
Fri, 24 Jan 1997 19:19:31 -0500
Laurie & Drew Beck wrote:
> In article <32E40A8F.5B89@conterra.com> Bob Whitaker <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > You clones consistently demand massive third world immigration into
> and>integration in All white majority countries and ONLY white majority.
> >Your "mulitracialism' is alwasy for Oslo, NEVER for Tokyo.
> >You know very well what the w hite race is, you target it perfectly.
> Bob, you're MISSING THE POINT. We want YOU to define who's white and
> who's not. You've heard me say this before, but it wasn't that long ago
> that my Irish ancestors weren't considered very white. I really want to
> know if that's changed over the years. And I want to hear it from YOU and
> your buddies, the racial experts. I'm just a novice at this race stuff. I
> mean, a human being is just a human being to me; I don't really care what
> color his/her skin is or what his/her hair looks like. I've got a lot more
> important things to worry about in life. So I need your HELP in defining
> who's white and who's not. I mean, this stuff must really be important if
> you're getting so worked up over it.
No, I do not defend the right of my race to exist. Why should I?
Your interest in your so-called "non-racism" is limited to immigration
and integration in white majority countries. You try to hide that
behind a pretense of objectivity, but that's ridiculous.