Re: There are racists; but no races.

Laurie & Drew Beck (
Sat, 25 Jan 1997 14:54:22

In article <> Bob Whitaker <> writes:

First, Bob said:

>> In article <> Bob Whitaker <> writes:
>> > You clones consistently demand massive third world immigration into
>> and>integration in All white majority countries and ONLY white majority.
>> >Your "mulitracialism' is alwasy for Oslo, NEVER for Tokyo.
>> >You know very well what the w hite race is, you target it perfectly.

Then, Drew replied:

>> Bob, you're MISSING THE POINT. We want YOU to define who's white and
>> who's not. You've heard me say this before, but it wasn't that long ago
>> that my Irish ancestors weren't considered very white. I really want to
>> know if that's changed over the years. And I want to hear it from YOU and
>> your buddies, the racial experts. I'm just a novice at this race stuff. I
>> mean, a human being is just a human being to me; I don't really care what
>> color his/her skin is or what his/her hair looks like. I've got a lot more
>> important things to worry about in life. So I need your HELP in defining
>> who's white and who's not. I mean, this stuff must really be important if
>> you're getting so worked up over it.
>> Drew

Then Bob answered:

> No, I do not defend the right of my race to exist. Why should I?
> Your interest in your so-called "non-racism" is limited to immigration
>and integration in white majority countries. You try to hide that
>behind a pretense of objectivity, but that's ridiculous.

Finally (& wearily), Drew replies:

Thanks ONCE AGAIN for completely evading my questions and diverting the
discussion to immigration and integration...subjects I didn't even bring
up. And who said anything about defending the right of "your" race to
exist??? I think I'll step outside and piss into the wind. I'd at least
be accomplishing SOMETHING by doing that.