Re: Patriarchy: Re: What Matriarchy?

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Bryant: "Re: Amerind an offensive term (was: Early Amerind assimilation"
• Previous message: Bryant: "Re: Amerind an offensive term (was: Early Amerind assimilation"

On Mon, 12 Aug 1996, William Edward Woody wrote:

[left out much, here & below]

> Footnote: Bryant *is* having problems with his ISP, as a recent
> e-mail exchange pointed out.
>
[either he was or I was or both :)]

>
> Life isn't black and white; it's not you and Bryant against me and
> Gale. And it isn't 'scientific objectivism' vs 'spiritual mumbo-jumbo,'
> either.
>
> Besides, who said I agreed with Mr. Price?
>

I didn't. Haven't argued philosophy with you enough to say, but I strongly
suspect a significant gulf.

Blessed Be,
Gale

(who claims even a mystic can assert the intrinsic reality of pizza with
mushrooms, black olives, and real Italian peppers)

P.S. --- I have abandoned the thread, I'm convinced that nothing
substantial remains worth saying, and name-calling and arguing over the
states of our various ISPs is not productive. (From a definite
non-computer person; I don't even know exactly what an 'ISP' is, though a
got the drift of the problem.)

• Next message: Bryant: "Re: Amerind an offensive term (was: Early Amerind assimilation"
• Previous message: Bryant: "Re: Amerind an offensive term (was: Early Amerind assimilation"