Re: Racial advantages? (from sci.bio.evolution)
9 Aug 1996 11:04:03 -0600
In article <email@example.com>,
James Howard <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>"Bryant" [asked] "Are you
>suggesting that transcriptional errors are more common during
>chimp-development? Do you have any evidence at all for such a
>The only reference to chimpanzees in my post is: "Human males and
>females have more testosterone than chimpanzee males and females
>respectively." I do not consider "transcriptional errors" in any
>manner or form.
Since you deleted the threading references here, I cannot quote your
original msg. I recall your stating that phenotypic quality was related
to lower transcriptional error rates due to androgens, at least within
humans, between races. This is where my question (above) came from.
Instead of reacting (as is typical on this group) with anger when posed a
question, you may consider answering it. For instance, in this case, you
seem to be saying that I mis-read your post. Hence, the simple answer to
my question would be "no."
Thank you for the citations.
>Bryant asks: "Do you mean to say that androgen production varies
>adaptively across species, reflecting different selection regimes? Or
>literally, that testosterone is the main selective pressure in human
>evolution?" Yes, I think testosterone is the main selective pressure
>in human evolution.
Thank you. How do you believe testosterone acted as a selective
pressure, approximately? If immunosuppresion is the major consideration
(instead of, say, selection pressures for muscle mass, which is mediated
by testosterone), wouldn't one expect for selection to disfavor testosterone?
>I invite Bryant, and anyone interested in this thread, to read my
>articles on human evolution and AIDS at
>http://www.naples.net/~nfn03605 on the web.