Re: Evidence for "Big Bang Theory"

Gil Hardwick (
Thu, 27 Apr 1995 03:55:37 GMT

Carl J Lydick (carl@SOL1.GPS.CALTECH.EDU) wrote:

[responding to Gil]

> I never made that claim. Why is that you, as an anthropologist who's
> demonstrated that he knows absolutly nothing about physics, feel motivated to
> bullshit about physics, Gil?

Bullshit about physics, Carl? Ridicule of all you half-witted computer
programmers sitting there at your terminals posting such tripe, on no
greater prompting than some other halfwit seeing parallels with some
particular physical theory in an eastern religion, I should say.

I don't give a crap about whatever it is you call "science". There is
nothing remotely resembling systematic enquiry into any phenomenon
whatsoever appearing here, nor for that matter desire among peers to
debate and review contemporary research, and there never has.

You and the likes of Scott, McCarthy et alia have set the standard for
high level Internet anarchy and ill-temper, so I fail to see that you
can complain that in the end the rest of us just give up and decide to
go along with you for the ride.

What the heck, is does become amusing on and off. Some of the wit is
absolutely charming . . .

He who refuses to qualify data is doomed to rant.
+61 97 53 3270