Re: Evidence for "Big Bang Theory"
Gil Hardwick (gil@landmark.iinet.net.au)
Thu, 27 Apr 1995 03:38:04 GMT
In article <3nkekb$7j7@gap.cco.caltech.edu>, Carl J Lydick (carl@SOL1.GPS.CALTECH.EDU) writes:
>If I recall correctly, it started out with somone claiming that the Big Bang
>theory was somehow a part of an Eastern religion that's been in existence for
>millenia, and that the fact that the Big Bang theory is currently the best
>model physics has to offer of the beginning of the universe somehow proved that
>that religion was valid. I.e., somebody's been listening to Deepak Chopra's
>bullshit.
What the hell difference does it make Carl whether the religion has
been around for millenia, or has returned to popularity, or whether
the latest 1990s research papers haven't in fact been heard of since
the 1950s.
Good christ you bloody stupid American computer programmers can get
jerked off over the most unbelievable crud! That you bother making
replying at all to such gobbledegook reveals the true state of your
so-called "science".
Why don't you just get it off here altogether.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
He who refuses to qualify data is doomed to rant.
+61 97 53 3270
|