Re: Why paleo?
Robert Gotschall (email@example.com(Robert)
18 Oct 1996 15:30:36 GMT
In <01bbbce1$9f390bc0$LocalHost@dan-pc> "Rohinton Collins"
>Why sci.anthropology.paleo? Surely it should be
>Do you miss out the 'e' in palaeoanthropology in America?
That would appear to be the case, at least according to the Random
House Unabridged Dictionary.
Although I have no clue as to which if any of the above was intended,
doesn't sci.anthropology.paleoanthropology seem a trifle redundant,