Re: AAT: I just rediscovered my news filter
jamesb@hgu.mrc.ac.uk
18 Oct 1995 14:22:38 GMT
pnich@globalone.net (Phil Nicholls) wrote:
>
>The primary objection to the aquatic ape theory is that there is no
>evidence to support it. If that is not a valid objection, if that
>does not "ring true" then I rather doubt that anything will.
>
The objection that there is no evidence to support the AAT is simply
false. See my posts about crying.
James Borrett.
|