Re: Plea for restraint... was re:AAT etc.
David L Burkhead (firstname.lastname@example.org)
14 Oct 1995 12:30:08 GMT
In article <email@example.com> firstname.lastname@example.org writes:
[ 8< ]
>I agree that some people seem to be getting way off the main thrust of
>the AAT argument here, but I still think that until anyone comes up with
>a really convincing reason why it can't be true it is definitely worth
Interesting that arguments against the validity of AAH are "off
the main thrust." And that _you_ don't find them convincing does not
mean that they are invalid. The same argument is used by creasionists
as to why "creationism" is true.
David L. Burkhead
Spacecub - The Artemis Project - Artemis Magazine
Akron, OH 44309-0831