Re: Clarification on relationship between Morphology and genes

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Mike Muller: "Re: A smug, insulting and offensive reply"
• Previous message: David Knowles: "Re: Apology to Ms. Morgan"
• Maybe in reply to: MacNetscape User at Texas A&M: "Clarification on relationship between Morphology and genes"
• Next in thread: James Borrett: "Re: Clarification on relationship between Morphology and genes"

karen@uab.edu (Karen ) wrote:
>6% diversity between human populations is incorrect.

This seems obvious, since the commonly quoted figure is that humans
and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) (also humans and bonobos, P.
paniscus) share 98 percent of our genetic material. My question is
what is the "accepted" amount of shared genetic material within
H.s.s.? Can anyone site specific studies on this?

Aleta v. Turner
aleta@uab.edu
http://www.geocities.com/TheTropics/1735/

• Next message: Mike Muller: "Re: A smug, insulting and offensive reply"
• Previous message: David Knowles: "Re: Apology to Ms. Morgan"
• Maybe in reply to: MacNetscape User at Texas A&M: "Clarification on relationship between Morphology and genes"
• Next in thread: James Borrett: "Re: Clarification on relationship between Morphology and genes"