Dating of 1470

Samuel H Hazleton V (hazlets@wizvax.wizvax.net)
Mon, 10 Jul 1995 00:36:58 GMT

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Harry Erwin: "Speech in H. erectus"
Previous message: Robert Groover: "Re: Book Review - The Descent of the Child (Elaine Morgan)"
Next in thread: HARRY R. ERWIN: "Re: Dating of 1470"

I understand that KNM-ER 1470 was originally dated at 2.9 million years
by Richard Leakey due to separate analyses that agreed (Fitch & Miller, Maglio)

Why were these analyses rejected? What led to the consensus for the present
dating of 1.8 million years?

Next message: Harry Erwin: "Speech in H. erectus"
Previous message: Robert Groover: "Re: Book Review - The Descent of the Child (Elaine Morgan)"
Next in thread: HARRY R. ERWIN: "Re: Dating of 1470"