|
|
Re: new topicAnia Lian (ania@LINGUA.CLTR.UQ.OZ.AU)Tue, 25 Oct 1994 15:34:41 +1000
contribute to the wellfare of the society which I see as the primary concern of any of human activities, and more so of intellectuals rather than looking for the reasons to establish one's superiority over others. I write this as I cannot comprehend things like recently in Australia, country of desert, the government made the decission to permit killing of kangaroos and deers as the drought has created a competition condition for grass (food) between these animals and cows, lambs etc.. My question is, there are countries which are "made" so to speak to support grazing without having to kill other creatures. However, with the market oriented on bying things only from particular places, we keep these countries away from trading (i.e. money) even for the price of enviromental distruction. Why is that women in Bolivia climb mountains to collect few gramms of tin, which by the way once upon the time was a major export material of Bolivia before the market started looking somewhere else for this resource. The poor women in order to not die chew cocoa leavs etc and also in order to not feel hunger. How to ensure that the market politics do not kill us, anihilate completely? What does our work teach us?? ania lian
|