Re: terms

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Errol Back-Cunningham: "Re: terms"
• Previous message: Gerold Firl: "Re: culture as gene-flow regulator: the arunta"
• Maybe in reply to: William ALBERT: "terms"
• Next in thread: Errol Back-Cunningham: "Re: terms"

ebc@ix.netcom.com(Errol Back-Cunningham) wrote:

>In <5292g0$6mq@news.inforamp.net> dlj@inforamp.net (David Lloyd-Jones)
>writes:
>[snip]

>>The "affect" referred to in schizoaffective is not affectation, but
>>affect, which means mood, with a slight bias toward meaning the
>>external manifestations of mood.
>
> Why don't you check your dictionary - the word affect means
> 'pretend to have or feel, counterfeit, fake, feign, imitate,
> pretend or sham etc.' Just because you invented a new word that
> does not make proper use of the old, does not mean that you're
> making sense...

Errol,

You're confusing the noun with the verb. You've been caught faking
it. If you don't have the balls to make a lighthearted apology, at
least have the sense to shut up.

-dlj.

• Next message: Errol Back-Cunningham: "Re: terms"
• Previous message: Gerold Firl: "Re: culture as gene-flow regulator: the arunta"
• Maybe in reply to: William ALBERT: "terms"
• Next in thread: Errol Back-Cunningham: "Re: terms"