Re: Homosexuality: male & female

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Daniel Maltz: "Re: culture as gene-flow regulator: the arunta"
• Previous message: stephanie mora: "Darwinism debunked by Berlinski? Hardly..."
• Maybe in reply to: Yousuf Khan: "Homosexuality: male & female"
• Next in thread: Yousuf Khan: "Re: Homosexuality: male & female"

On 17 Sep 1996 08:52:34 -0600, mycol1@unm.edu (Bryant) wrote:

>>Okay, Bryant, so there are physical correlations to sexual
>>preferences, but so what?

>The nature of the correlates suggests that early, perhaps prenatal,
>development is responsable for sexual orientation. These indicators I
>mentioned are discretely distributed. So, I argue that sexual
>orientations are also discrete, rather than the continuum some have argued.

Maybe it is discrete, but what are the physical correlates that describe
bisexuals? They always seem to drop off into a miscellaneous category in
study after study.

If the orientations are discrete how many discrete points are we talking
about? Certainly not two, and three doesn't seem to fit too well either.
Maybe 20? Any guesses?

Yousuf Khan

--

Yousuf J. Khan

ykhan@achilles.net

Ottawa, Ont, Canada

Nation's capital

• Next message: Daniel Maltz: "Re: culture as gene-flow regulator: the arunta"
• Previous message: stephanie mora: "Darwinism debunked by Berlinski? Hardly..."
• Maybe in reply to: Yousuf Khan: "Homosexuality: male & female"
• Next in thread: Yousuf Khan: "Re: Homosexuality: male & female"