Re: how many bastards are there, anyway?

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: s5600475@nickel.laurentian.ca: "listservice info. required"
• Previous message: Paul Bernhardt: "Re: Reply to Nicolle"

sfolse@odin.cair.du.edu (sgf) wrote:

>In article <3224D997.69B4@compuserve.com>,
>Hugh Gibbons <103305.62@compuserve.com> wrote:

>>I don't like this explanation because it relies on fairly dubious
>>assumptions.
>>(That attractive men have genes that make them able to survive better.)
>>
>>The more conventional and more likely explanation is that females have
>>orgasm to attract them to the act of sex, which results in procreation.
>>Since women are intelligent, men would have a hard time persuading them
>>to engage in sex, knowing the dangers of pregnancy, unless the women
>>got immediate benefit.

>Why do women, then, not orgasm every time? And why is orgasm reachable
>on a far more reliable basis by masturbation, oral sex, direct
>stimulation rather than by male penetration and ejaculation? Seems that if
>the orgasm was the attractive bit, them women would spend far more time
>masturbating and engaging in other sexual practices rather than straight
>intercourse.

>--Stephanie

Perhaps you missed something in your education ??

• Next message: s5600475@nickel.laurentian.ca: "listservice info. required"
• Previous message: Paul Bernhardt: "Re: Reply to Nicolle"