Re: Adaptationism again

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Stephen Barnard: "Re: AUSTRALOIDS"
• Previous message: Elazar Harel: "thought-experiment"
• Maybe in reply to: Bryant: "Adaptationism again"
• Next in thread: Bryant: "Re: Adaptationism again"

In article <518a0m$bv7@panix2.panix.com>, Paul Gallagher <pcg@panix.com> wrote:
>In <32359BF8.6DE9@megafauna.com> Stephen Barnard <steve@megafauna.com> writes:
>
>>- Straw-man argumentation.
>
>No. Don't believe everything Dawkins tells you.
>
>Is Dawkins becoming the new Ayn Rand? All these little Dawkins-ites
>so sure they know everything!

What makes you so sure that everybody who agrees with
Dawkins on some points is a Dawkin-ite? Or is that just another example
of the "label and denounce by association with that label" strategy y'all
are so fond of in these parts?

How about dealing with some substantive arguments?

Bryant

>Paul

• Next message: Stephen Barnard: "Re: AUSTRALOIDS"
• Previous message: Elazar Harel: "thought-experiment"
• Maybe in reply to: Bryant: "Adaptationism again"
• Next in thread: Bryant: "Re: Adaptationism again"