|
|
Re: Patriarchy: Re: What Matriarchy?
Mary Beth Williams (mbwillia@ix.netcom.com(Mary)
11 Sep 1996 04:03:36 GMT
In <5147ja$2f8q@argo.unm.edu> mycol1@unm.edu (Bryant) writes:
>
>In article <513k7d$at1@sjx-ixn2.ix.netcom.com>,
>Mary Beth Williams <mbwillia@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>
>>Bryant, now be careful <g>... Sociobiological and evolutionary
>>(selectionist) frameworks are not at all one and the same... Just ask
a
>>guru of the latter, Dave Rindos (whom I count among my friends, even
if
>>he is *misguided* <g>).
>
>I'm not familiar with Rindos. Sociobiology is indeed a school of
>selectionism. That, after all, has been its critics' biggest bitch.
>
Bryant, I would check out your own anthro department's, even those
selectionsists, reaction to being termed *sociobiologists*. Really is
considered a *dirty word*, even more so than *marxist* ;-D.
As far as Rindos, he's one of the top *selectionist* archaeologists, (a
student of Dunnell, whom I assume you _have_ heard of, as the foremost
selectionist in the field whom Lenny can quote chapter and verse <g>)
and a well-renowned expert on the origins of agriculture.
MB Williams
Dept. of Anthro., UMass-Amherst
|